So that was pretty typical...there were actually only 5 games that qualified (Boston/Toronto was postponed), and in those 5 games, PickLogic had a record of 3-2 (with one of the losses being the pick for the day).

More importantly, perhaps, the two teams that lost on Friday (the White Sox and the Angels) both came back to win on Saturday, justifying the pick methodology; remember, it's not really about picking a team to win on any given day, but rather intelligent risk management by avoiding long losing streaks.

No pick for Sunday...we'll almost certainly have a selection on Monday.
 

So what your'e saying is that it wouldn't have mattered which one of the 5 games you took on Friday? Wouldn't the payout have been higher if you had just won the first game?
 

Yes, exactly -- as it turns out, all 5 of those selections would have resulted in our key goal: a win without too many (if any) losses in a row.

It's certainly true that, given the -140 line on the second game (the winner), that our clients would have benefitted more from going 1-0 vs. going 1-1...as it was, we returned a .25% gain instead of a .62% gain...but this isn't a sprint, it's a marathon. In the end, as long as our clients' accounts keep moving forward, that's the only goal.